Can a Distracted Driving Accident in Hazel Park Qualify for a Third-Party Claim?

May 30, 2026 | By Kajy Law Firm
Can a Distracted Driving Accident in Hazel Park Qualify for a Third-Party Claim?

If you were hurt by a distracted driver in Hazel Park, you may be able to pursue compensation beyond what your own insurance covers. Michigan law allows injured people to file a third-party claim against the at-fault driver when injuries meet a specific legal threshold.

Each case is different. Speaking with an attorney early can help you understand whether your situation qualifies and what steps to take next.

Schedule A Free Consultation

What Happens After a Distracted Driving Accident in Hazel Park?

Being hit by a distracted driver is frustrating enough on its own. Understanding what your legal options are afterward can feel just as overwhelming, especially when insurance companies are involved and the process is unfamiliar.

Distracted driving accidents in Hazel Park happen regularly along corridors like John R Road, Nine Mile Road, and Dequindre. When another driver's inattention causes your injuries, Michigan law may allow you to pursue compensation directly from that driver's insurance for pain and suffering and other damages your own policy does not cover. 

This guide explains how that process works and what it takes to qualify.

Key Takeaways About Distracted Driving Third-Party Claims in Hazel Park

  • A third-party claim allows you to pursue pain and suffering damages from the at-fault driver's insurance, which your own no-fault PIP coverage does not provide
  • To qualify, your injuries typically must meet Michigan's serious impairment of body function threshold under MCL 500.3135
  • Distracted driving can be established through phone records, witness statements, traffic camera footage, and police reports
  • Michigan's modified comparative fault rule means your recovery may be reduced if you are found partially at fault
  • You generally have 3 years from the date of the crash to file a third-party claim under MCL 600.5805

Every distracted driving case is different. An attorney can help evaluate whether your injuries and the available evidence support a viable third-party claim.

What Do the Numbers Say About Distracted Driving in Michigan?

  • The NHTSA reports that distracted driving claimed 3,308 lives nationally in a single recent year, with thousands more injured in crashes involving inattentive drivers
  • According to the Michigan Traffic Crash Facts database, distracted driving is consistently cited as a contributing factor in thousands of Michigan crashes annually, with Oakland County among the most affected areas
  • The Michigan Department of State Police notes that cell phone use remains one of the most frequently documented forms of driver distraction in crash reports across the state

These numbers matter legally because documented distraction strengthens the negligence argument at the core of any third-party claim.

What Is a Third-Party Claim and How Does Distracted Driving Factor In?

Michigan requires all drivers to carry no-fault Personal Injury Protection coverage. After a crash, your own PIP pays for medical expenses and a portion of lost wages regardless of who caused the accident. That is the no-fault part of the system.

A third-party claim is different. It is a claim filed against the driver who caused the crash through their liability insurance. It allows you to pursue compensation for pain and suffering and other damages PIP does not cover. Distracted driving matters here because it establishes the negligence needed to support that claim.

What Makes Distracted Driving a Form of Negligence in Michigan?

Car accident scene in Detroit showing severe vehicle damage after a collision, relevant to determining what a car accident case is worth.

Negligence means a driver failed to act with reasonable care and that failure caused your injuries. In Michigan, all drivers have a legal duty to keep their attention on the road.

When a driver looks at their phone, eats, adjusts their GPS, or engages in any behavior that takes their focus away from driving, they are breaching that duty. If that breach caused your crash and injuries, it forms the foundation of a third-party negligence claim.

What Does Serious Impairment of Body Function Mean for Your Claim?

To pursue pain and suffering damages from the at-fault driver, your injuries typically must qualify as a serious impairment of body function under MCL 500.3135. This means an objectively documented injury to an important body function that affects your ability to lead your normal life.

In practical terms this often includes traumatic brain injuries, significant back or spinal injuries, severe soft tissue damage requiring surgery, and fractures that affect mobility or daily function. Whether your injuries meet this threshold depends on medical documentation and how that evidence is presented.

How Do You Prove the Other Driver Was Distracted in Hazel Park?

Proving distraction is one of the most important parts of a third-party claim involving an inattentive driver. Unlike a DUI where a chemical test provides clear evidence, distraction requires building a case from multiple sources.

Can Phone Records Be Used to Prove Distracted Driving?

Yes. Cell phone records can show whether a driver was actively using their phone at the time of the crash. These records can be obtained through the legal discovery process once a claim or lawsuit is filed.

In many Hazel Park distracted driving cases, phone records are among the most compelling evidence available because they provide a timestamped record of activity that can be cross-referenced with the exact time of the crash.

What Other Evidence Supports a Distracted Driving Claim?

Several types of evidence can help establish that the other driver was not paying attention at the time of the crash.

Witness statements from people who saw the driver looking at a phone or otherwise distracted before impact can be valuable. Traffic and security camera footage from intersections along John R Road or Dequindre in Hazel Park may capture the moments leading up to the crash. 

Police reports that note distraction as a contributing factor carry significant weight. The physical evidence of the crash itself, including the angle of impact and the absence of skid marks suggesting no braking, can also support a distraction argument.

What if the Driver Denies Being Distracted?

Drivers involved in accidents rarely admit to distraction at the scene. That is expected and does not prevent a successful third-party claim.

An attorney can work to gather the evidence needed to establish distraction independently of what the driver admits. In many cases the combination of phone records, witness accounts, camera footage, and crash reconstruction analysis builds a picture that is difficult to dispute.

What Problems Do People Face When Pursuing a Distracted Driving Claim in Hazel Park?

Several challenges arise regularly in distracted driving third-party claims, and knowing them in advance can help you avoid the most common mistakes.

What if There Were No Witnesses to the Distraction?

Witness testimony is helpful but not required. Many successful distracted driving claims are built on physical evidence, phone records, and accident reconstruction without a single witness who saw the driver looking at their phone.

An attorney can help identify what evidence is available and how to obtain it through the legal process, including records that are not publicly accessible without a formal request or court order.

What if the At-Fault Driver's Insurer Disputes That Distraction Caused the Crash?

Insurers frequently challenge causation in distracted driving cases. Common arguments include claiming that road conditions, your own driving behavior, or mechanical factors caused the crash rather than the driver's inattention.

Michigan's modified comparative fault rule means that if you are found to be 51% or more at fault, you typically cannot recover non-economic damages from the other driver. This makes countering those arguments with strong evidence a critical part of the claims process.

What if Your Injuries Developed Over Time After the Crash?

Delayed symptoms are common in distracted driving crashes, particularly with soft tissue injuries, whiplash, and traumatic brain injuries. Insurers often use a gap between the crash and the appearance of symptoms to argue that the injuries were not caused by the accident.

Consistent medical documentation from as early as possible after the crash, along with records showing how symptoms developed, can address this argument. An attorney can help build that record in a way that holds up during negotiations or litigation.

What if the Distracted Driver Had Minimal Insurance Coverage?

If the at-fault driver carried only minimum liability coverage, their policy may not fully cover your damages. Depending on your own policy, uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage may provide additional recovery options.

An attorney can review all available coverage sources to identify every avenue that may apply to your specific situation.

What Laws and Deadlines Apply to Distracted Driving Claims in Hazel Park?

Michigan law provides the framework for distracted driving third-party claims, and understanding the key rules before taking action can protect your options.

What Michigan Laws Apply to Distracted Driving and Third-Party Claims?

Experienced Southfield Car Accident Lawyer

Michigan's Distracted Driving Law prohibits the use of handheld mobile devices while driving under MCL 257.602b. A citation issued to the at-fault driver under this statute can strengthen the negligence argument in a third-party claim by establishing that the driver violated a specific legal duty.

The right to pursue a third-party claim for pain and suffering is governed by Michigan's no-fault law under MCL 500.3135, which sets the serious impairment threshold. The statute of limitations for filing is 3 years from the date of the crash under MCL 600.5805.

How Does Michigan's Comparative Fault Rule Affect a Distracted Driving Claim?

Michigan follows a modified comparative fault system. Your recovery from the at-fault driver can be reduced by your percentage of fault in the crash. At 51% or more fault, you generally cannot recover non-economic damages from the other driver.

In distracted driving cases, insurers sometimes argue that the victim contributed to the crash by failing to avoid a collision that an attentive driver would have avoided. Strong evidence of the other driver's distraction helps counter that argument.

What Compensation May Be Available After a Distracted Driving Accident in Hazel Park?

Type of CompensationWhat It CoversNotes
Medical ExpensesEmergency care, surgery, therapy, future treatmentCosts beyond PIP limits require a third-party claim
Lost WagesIncome lost during recovery, reduced future earning capacityBeyond PIP's 85% wage replacement cap
Pain and SufferingPhysical pain, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of lifeRequires meeting serious impairment threshold
Excess Economic DamagesOut-of-pocket costs not covered by PIPDocumented expenses required
Long-Term CareOngoing treatment for serious or permanent injuriesOften underestimated in early settlement offers

Insurance companies calculate settlement offers using their own formulas, which often do not reflect the full long-term impact of serious injuries. An attorney may be able to work to build a more complete picture of what fair compensation actually looks like in your case.

What Can You Do Right Now to Protect Your Distracted Driving Claim in Hazel Park?

These are general practices, not legal advice. Every situation is different.

  • Many claimants find it helpful to note any observations about the other driver's behavior before impact, including whether they appeared to be looking at a phone, and write those details down as soon as possible while memory is fresh
  • Seeking medical care promptly after the crash and attending all follow-up appointments creates the consistent record that supports a third-party claim
  • Saving all correspondence with insurance companies, including texts, emails, and notes from phone calls, can be valuable if disputes arise later
  • Many people wish they had consulted an attorney before giving a recorded statement to the at-fault driver's insurer
  • Preserving any dashcam footage, photos from the scene, and contact information for witnesses at the time of the crash strengthens the evidentiary foundation of the claim

Ask Kajy Law Firm

What should I do at the scene of a distracted driving crash in Hazel Park to protect my claim later?

If you are able, document as much as possible at the scene. Note any observations about the other driver's behavior before impact, photograph vehicle damage and road conditions, and collect contact information from any witnesses. 

Avoid giving a statement to the other driver's insurer before consulting an attorney. The steps you take in the hours and days immediately following the crash can significantly affect what evidence is available later.

What if I was partially distracted myself at the time of the crash?

Michigan's comparative fault system means your recovery may be reduced by your percentage of fault. However, being partially distracted does not automatically prevent a third-party claim. If the other driver's distraction was the primary cause of the crash and your injuries meet the serious impairment threshold, you may still be able to pursue compensation. 

An attorney can assess how fault is likely to be evaluated in your specific situation.

How long does it typically take to resolve a distracted driving third-party claim in Michigan?

Timelines vary significantly depending on injury severity, the strength of the distraction evidence, and whether the insurer disputes liability. Some cases resolve through negotiation in several months. Cases involving serious injuries, disputed fault, or limited insurance coverage can take considerably longer. An attorney familiar with Oakland County cases can give you a more specific sense of what to expect.

What if the distracted driver was working at the time of the crash, such as a delivery driver or rideshare driver?

If the at-fault driver was acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the crash, their employer may also bear liability under a legal principle called respondeat superior. 

Rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft carry their own insurance policies that may apply depending on the driver's status at the time of the crash. These situations involve additional layers of coverage that an attorney can help navigate.

Distracted Driving Claim Questions Answered by Attorneys

What should I do if the distracted driving crash happened months ago and I did not act right away? 

You may still be within Michigan's 3-year statute of limitations under MCL 600.5805, which means a third-party claim could still be viable. However, delays make it harder to gather evidence, obtain phone records, locate witnesses, and document the ongoing impact of injuries. Consulting an attorney as soon as possible, regardless of how much time has passed, gives your claim the strongest possible foundation going forward.

What if there is no camera footage and no witnesses to the distraction? 

Many successful distracted driving claims are built without direct witness testimony or camera footage. Phone records, crash reconstruction analysis, the physical evidence of the crash itself, and the absence of braking before impact can collectively build a compelling case. An attorney can help identify what evidence is available and how to obtain records that are not publicly accessible.

Can I still file a third-party claim if the distracted driving crash happened on a side street in Hazel Park rather than a main road? 

Yes. The location of the crash does not determine whether a third-party claim is viable. What matters is the evidence of distraction, the nature of your injuries, and whether they meet Michigan's serious impairment threshold. Crashes on residential streets and parking lots can support third-party claims just as crashes on major corridors like John R Road or Nine Mile Road can.

What if the at-fault driver claims my car pulled out in front of them and they could not stop in time? 

This is a common defense in distracted driving cases. An attorney can work to counter it using phone records showing the driver was active on their device at the time of the crash, physical evidence showing the lack of braking before impact, and witness accounts or camera footage that contradict the driver's version of events.

What Happened to You Was Not Your Fault. Your Options May Be Broader Than You Think.

Lawrence Kajy

Being hit by a distracted driver in Hazel Park can turn your life upside down in ways that go far beyond the initial crash. Medical bills, missed work, and the back-and-forth with insurance companies pile up while you are trying to recover.

At Kajy Law Firm, our role is to pursue every avenue of compensation available to you under Michigan law, advocate for the full impact of your injuries, and handle the process so you can focus on what matters most. We work with injured people across Hazel Park, Southfield, Detroit, Dearborn, and the surrounding Metro Detroit area.

We offer free consultations and work on a contingency fee basis. You pay nothing unless we recover for you.

Call us at 248-702-6641, visit us at 18000 W Nine Mile Rd #1400, Southfield, MI 48075, or reach us online.

Schedule A Free Consultation